PLS Discriminant Analysis
Required packages
The required packages for this section are pandas, seaborn and scikit-learn. These can be installed with the following command in the command window (Windows) / terminal (Mac).
pip install pandas seaborn scikit-learnLoading the data
We will again use the demo lipidomics dataset:
Load the dataset into a Pandas DataFrame named df as described in the basic plotting section:
import pandas as pd
df = pd.read_excel("Lipidomics_dataset.xlsx", decimal=",")
df.set_index("Sample Name", inplace=True)PLS-DA
Data normalisation
The first step is to normalise the data such that the features (lipids) have zero mean and unit variance, this can easily be done with the StandardScaler from sklearn. By indexing the dataframe with df.iloc[:,1:] we'll select all the data in de dataframe, except for the first column, which contains the labels:
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
scaler = StandardScaler()
df_normalised = scaler.fit_transform(df.iloc[:,1:])Label encoding
The PLS algorithm was developed for continuous regression problems, but in PLS-DA we use the PLS algorithm with the response vector y being an integer representation of the group labels. To encode the labels as integers, we can use the LabelEncoder from sklearn:
from sklearn.preprocessing import LabelEncoder
le = LabelEncoder()
encoded_labels = le.fit_transform(df.Label)PLS-DA
Next, we'll use the PLSRegression algorithm from sklearn, and we select 2 components:
from sklearn.cross_decomposition import PLSRegression
plsda = PLSRegression(n_components=2)
plsda_features = plsda.fit_transform(df_normalised, encoded_labels)[0]We put the results in a DataFrame, together with the group labels:
plsda_features = pd.DataFrame(data=plsda_features,
columns=["Latent variable 1","Latent variable 2"],
index=df.index)
plsda_features["Label"] = df.LabelNow we can plot the results:
import seaborn as sns
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
sns.scatterplot(x='Latent variable 1',
y='Latent variable 2',
data=plsda_features,
hue="Label");
plt.show()
Loadings
The loadings of PLS-DA can be calculated as the Pearson correlation between the original centred and scaled data and the components T (x-scores):
import numpy as np
x_loadings = [np.corrcoef(df_normalised[:,y], plsda.x_scores_[:,0])[0][1] for y in range(df_normalised.shape[1])]
y_loadings = [np.corrcoef(df_normalised[:,y], plsda.x_scores_[:,1])[0][1] for y in range(df_normalised.shape[1])]We'll put the calculated loadings in a DataFrame:
plsda_loadings = pd.DataFrame(
data={"Latent variable 1": x_loadings, "Latent variable 2": y_loadings},
index=df.columns[1:]
)And to visualise the loadings:
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(15,15))
p1 = sns.scatterplot(x='Latent variable 1',
y='Latent variable 2',
data=plsda_loadings,
size = 15,
ax=ax,
legend=False)
for line in range(0, plsda_loadings.shape[0]):
p1.text(plsda_loadings["Latent variable 1"][line]+0.005, plsda_loadings["Latent variable 2"][line],
df.columns[line], horizontalalignment='left',
size='small', color='black')
plt.show();
Making predictions with PLS-DA
Once a PLS model is constructed, it can be used to predict the labels of new samples (the labels are N, PAN or T in our demo dataset, but for this example we'll restrict the model to N and T samples) . Since we don't have an independent dataset, we'll split some random samples from our dataset before training the model, the training set will be used to construct the PLS-DA model, the test set to evaluate its performance. Since we are now interested getting a model that is capable of making accurate predictions and not simply in visualising the data like in the previous section, we don't have to limit ourselves to just 2 components in our model, we'll perform a cross validation experiment to find the number of components that gives the best predictive performance. These concepts are explained in more detail in the R section on PLS-DA.
First, we'll limit our dataset to N and T samples, and we'll store the labels of those samples in a separate variable:
df_normalised_T_N = df_normalised[(df.Label == "T") | (df.Label == "N")]
labels = df[(df.Label == "T") | (df.Label == "N")]["Label"]For the PLS to work, we'll have to convert the categorical outcome variable (the labels T and N) to zeros and ones:
from sklearn.preprocessing import LabelEncoder
le = LabelEncoder()
encoded_labels = le.fit_transform(labels)Next, we'll split the dataset and labels into a training set (70% of the samples) and test set (30% of the samples). We use the stratify option to ensure that the training and test sets have the same proportion of T and N samples:
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
# Split Data into Train (70%) and Test (30%)
DataTrain, DataTest, YTrain, YTest = train_test_split(
df_normalised_T_N,
encoded_labels,
test_size=3/10,
stratify=encoded_labels)Next, we'll perform a 5 fold cross-validation (cv =5) to find the optimal number of components (we'll test a range of 1 to 6)
from sklearn.cross_decomposition import PLSRegression
from sklearn.model_selection import GridSearchCV
# Parameter Dictionary
param_dict = {'n_components': [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]}
# initialize the hyperparameter search
plsda = PLSRegression()
grid_search = GridSearchCV(estimator=plsda,
param_grid=param_dict,
cv=5)
# Fit the model
grid_search.fit(DataTrain, YTrain)
# Print the best hyperparameters and the corresponding mean cross-validated score
print("Scores: ",grid_search.cv_results_["mean_test_score"])
print("Best Hyperparameters: ", grid_search.best_params_)
print("Best Score: ", grid_search.best_score_)We observe the following output (the values may vary slightly due to the random nature of the splitting the samples in training and test sets):
Scores: [0.35284577 0.45803027 0.47096677 0.39744749 0.44634731 0.41809231]
Best Hyperparameters: {'n_components': 3}
Best Score: 0.4709667670077217We observe that the scores increase up until 3 components, after which they start decreasing, making 3 components the best choice for this model. We now train a PLS model with 3 components on the training dataset, and we'll use this model to get predictions on the test dataset.
plsda = PLSRegression(n_components=3)
plsda_model = plsda.fit(DataTrain, YTrain)
y_pred = plsda_model.predict(DataTest)
y_pred = (y_pred > 0.5).astype('uint8')Remember that PLS-DA is really just a PLS where we converted the categorical labels to zeros and ones, and PLS is a regression model which predicts a continuous output. We'll map all predicted values > 0.5 to 1 and <0.5 to zero:
y_pred = (y_pred > 0.5).astype('uint8')Finally, by comparing the predicted labels with the actual labels, we can calculate the accuracy of the model and we can calculate a confusion matrix:
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score, confusion_matrix
print(f"Accuracy: {accuracy_score(YTest, y_pred):.2f}")
tn, fp, fn, tp = confusion_matrix(YTest, y_pred).ravel()
print(f"True negative rate: {tn/(tn+fp):.2f}")
print(f"False negative rate: {fn/(fn+tp):.2f}")
print(f"True positive rate: {tp/(tp+fn):.2f}")
print(f"False positive rate: {fp/(fp+tn):.2f}")We observe the following output (may again be slightly different):
Accuracy: 0.85
True negative rate: 0.79
False negative rate: 0.09
True positive rate: 0.91
False positive rate: 0.21Last updated